A PEOPLE'S NWO
THE ENEMY'S NWO
COUNTER ATTACK CONSTITUTES PHASE II.
Its implementation depends on the success of the JUST SAY NO campaign.
We can't beat the ENEMY long-term by just SAYING NO, they are too entrenched and
ALL POWERFUL. As set-out below we simply displace their Global Organisational Operation
by replacing it with our own SUPERIOR MODEL.
FROM ONE MAJOR
With the advent of Industrialized Warfare CENTRALISATION has caused more death, mutilation, misery and destruction in the past 120 years than in its previous 6000 years of so-called civilized existence because CENTRALISATION puts POWER at the top. Every Tyrant, Dictator, Psychopath, Satanist and Dysfunctional Megalomaniac, through every means conceivable, ends up sitting on or behind the seat of POWER.
Centralisation is aided and abetted by IDEOLOGY which is used as a 'mind magnet' to attract the allegiance of the masses, through which power is gained and sustained, by creating a division of choice that passes for democracy.
WE WOULD SIMPLY ASK
Name ONE ideology that has proved a success in uniting people to a mutually beneficial endeavour or outcome? The millions who died under Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot stand testimony to the gruesome consequences of IDEOLOGIES that spawn CENTRALISM.
We are now facing the ULTIMATE manifestation of this syndrome were a relatively small psychotic group is on the cusp of achieving domination over the entire world.
No ENEMY could have subjected the world to such devastation without gaining control over a CENTRALISED system - obvious solution - DECENTRALISE POWER - JETTISON IDEOLOGY.
THIS IS OUR ONLY OPTION
BECAUSE OUR EXISTING GOVERNING SYSTEM HAS BEEN TOTALLY CORRUPTED AND IS BEYOND REFORM.
THE VILLAGE/PARISH MATRIX
The Single-Core Element of the future Global Geodesic Network
Leadership 'POWER' structure emanates from the bottom up - bad guys and psychopaths will be filtered out a third of the way up at Constituency level. ULTIMATE RESULT, NO MORE WARS FOR PROFIT or attempted GLOBAL TAKEOVERS.
CLICK HERE for notes, sketches and future applications. We foresee a new Global Healthcare Model providing universal access to high-quality care at 60% of present-day costs by 2050. Residential areas will be virtually crime-free and Income Tax cut by 40%. None of this could be accomplished under a CENTRALISED sytem.
Once the criminal YOKE of the ENEMY has been removed from the neck of Humanity, the World will be a far happier place to be.
DEMOLISHES THE ENEMY'S STRUCTURE OF CONTROL
THIS IS OUR PRINCIPLE COUNTER ATTACK WEAPON
But How do you Decentralise a Centralised Structure?
You Can't - it's too entrenched and rigid a structure inhabited by a hierarchy that would sooner 'cut off an arm' than relinquish its Power, Authority and Privileges; that's why it has survived for so long.
Breaking the IMPASSE
Thanks to the ENEMY, WE NO LONGER HAVE A CHOICE - DECENTRALISATION is the only way we can CLEANSE the ENEMY from our SYSTEM and ensure they never rise-up to THREATEN us again. It also offers the most wonderful opportunity to build a new 21st Century Global Management System capable of transforming life on earth.
The ENEMY has made a fatal mistake
They have spent years infiltrating and conspiring to gain access and control over the Governing structure that holds authority over us. But they have sunk their teeth into a hopelessly outdated model that belongs to the 19th Industrial Century.
As Buckminster Fuller observed: There's no point opposing the existing ORDER, far better to build a new MODEL that renders the OLD ORDER OBSOLETE.
The New Decentralised Model
The ENEMY'S INTERNET was built over the old 19th Century model, but the technology deployed belongs to the 21st Century. Does it not seem logical that we use the intrinsic potentialities of this TECHNOLOGY to build an entirely NEW MODEL?
What do Humans Essentially Need?
(This is where it gets interesting)
Human beings are instinctively tribal but have psychological and biological limits to the size of the tribe they prefer to be a part of. Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary psychology, found that there is a limit of 100-200 people any one person can maintain stable relationships with. A limitation also extends to the size of effective groups versus ineffective groups. He found that effective communities tend to remain at between 500 - 2500 people.
The human mind does not adapt well to a vast tribal group, and recoils from the idea of a "global tribe". The truth is, human beings function far better in smaller groups and they do not like to be forced into participating in any group, let alone larger groups. This may account for the feeling of isolation that is common among people who live in metropolitan areas. They are surrounded by millions of neighbours and perhaps hundreds of associates yet they still feel alone because they do not have a functioning tribe of acceptable size.
Globalist collectivism is simply unnatural. People know it unconsciously, they know it is an act of force and oppression, and will invariably move to sabotage its false tribalism as they begin to see it’s true colours - hence the Enemy's need the construct it's Gulags.
So if the future model can satisfy the above criteria for optimum human co-existence we can expect to relieve much of the anxiety, misery, stress and loneliness, so apparent in Society today.
The proposed New Model could be described as a new form of Global Internet layered over the existing one but configured territorially to accommodate 500 - 2500 people in autonomous self-governing cells, called 'villages'. A server hub connects everybody in the village to a community interface that will be physical, not virtual. Villages will be connected to each other to form Parishes, Parishes connect to form Constituencies, Constituencies connect to form a Nation, Nations connect to the World.
Using existing communication infrastructure the whole thing could operate through a 'smartphone'. Boundary lines will have to be drawn up but this, like any other boundary through the ages, will simply involve the drawing of an agreed line on a map - and be open to realignment if necessary.
The New Decentralised Model was formulated many years ago but would never have been adopted because it would have undermined too many vested interests.
It also lacked an underlying philosophy, but thanks to a Mr John Ward (to be found HERE) it has now recently acquired one of unparalleled good sense. It is as follows:
All revolutions fail because they attempt to change the system - not the structure. It’s like
changing the scenery on the back-set of a play as opposed to rebuilding the theatre.
Evolution on the other hand, aside from its biological interpretation, is defined as:
‘a process of gradual and relatively peaceful social, political and economic advance’
Evolution is altogether more profound and permanent than a revolutionary ‘scene change’ because rather than being enforced systematically from the top-down, it starts with things like ’people’ who actually make up society - and then aims to take every cultural element into account from the ground-up. This means that, by definition, if those gradual actions taken are in accord with human’s natural anthropological inclinations, they are far more likely to be permanent. This process might be a series of concentric circles, but the overall trend over time is a straight line in the direction of a meaningful goal.
What we are NOT DOING in the West is evolving the way we interact to produce something more broadly fruitful; rather, we lurch from one revolutionary extreme to another and just go round in circles.
This philosophical understanding is built into the NEW MODEL which has been specifically designed to facilitate an adapted version of Jeremy Bentham's maxim, i.e. ' WHAT WORKS BEST for the greatest happiness of the greatest number'. In practice, Bentham's GREATEST NUMBER would be unworkable under a CENTRALISED system because, as Professor Jordon Peterson would undoubtedly point out, the world is a complex place and people would have an infinite number of ways of defining happiness in the context of ''WHAT WORKS BEST'. This problem will not apply, to the same degree, in the proposed Village/Parish matrix.
Intrinsic Potential of the Decentralised Set-up
Say, for example, 70% of a village agree to try-out a new radical social initiative, early trials indicate certain application problems, so they either modify or abandon it. If it proved successful every other village in the land would either adopt or improve upon it. This basic approach would serve as a generator for human ingenuity, imagination and enthusiasm and transform our sclerotic CENTRALISED SYSTEM OF STATE.
Giving people Self-Determination over their own lives in their own territorial domains will engage ENERGIES presently lying idle or hopelessly under-utilised. The scope is infinite for changing virtually everything we presently consider immutable. This factor alone justifies any sacrifice required to make the transition to a new 21st Century World.
All the above should provide something to look forward to, a completely new start. We are going to experience a period of great difficulty and hardship when the ENEMY pulls the rug on the Global Economy. The new Decentralised Geodesic Network will come with a new economic model, as yet to be determined, but knowing we have a positive platform on which to build the future should sustain us through whatever we may have to endure in the transitional period between the past and the future.